| ±Ûº¸±â | |||||
| Á¦¸ñ | supporters, the eligibility | Á¶È¸¼ö | 32 | ||
| ±Û¾´ÀÌ | Gal3Gher () | µî·ÏÀÏ | 20-01-02 | ||
| ÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ | |||||
| ³»¿ë | In 2019, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) ruled ¸íǰ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ®=¸íǰ·¹Çø®Ä«»çÀÌÆ®<br /> in favour of a hugely controversial IAAF rule that forced the South African runner - and other athletes with differences in sexual development (DSD) - to take hormone-limiting drugs if she wanted to compete in the middle-distance events she had dominated for years. After a long legal battle, Semenya pulled out of the World Championships. For Semenya's supporters, the eligibility regulation was an appalling breach of human rights and a ³ÃÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å»=¿õÁøÄÚ¿þÀÌ ³ÃÁ¤¼ö±â·»Å» Á¦ºù±â°â¿ë ½Ç¹ö / CPI-6500LÃÖ°í<br /> discriminatory act of sexism and racism designed to target her. For others, it was a necessary and proportionate step to protect women's sport and fair competition. But whatever one's perspective, there is no doubt that the debate has confronted sport with uncomfortable questions ¿äÁö¾ß¸¶¸ðÅä=¿äÁö¾ß¸¶¸ðÅä¿©¼ºÀÇ·ù<br /> around gender identity and human biology, the suitability of sport's traditional male and female categories, È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼º°¡¹æ=È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼º°¡¹æ È«Äá¸íǰ¿©¼º°¡¹æ È«Äá¸íǰ³²¼ºÁö°©<br /> the reliability of the medical science on which the IAAF's rule relies, perceptions of womanhood and sport's complex relationship with the law. |
||||
![]() |
|
|||
![]() |
doping culture | 2020-01-02 |
![]() |
Sheffield United suffer most from VAR calls | 2020-01-02 |